 |
|
My work, for the past five years, has addressed and dealt
with the relationship between science and nature. I have mostly interpreted
this relationship in terms of conflict; by narrowing down this multifaceted
dichotomy I have chosen technology as a manifestation of, as well as a
symbol for, science.
|
|
At first I
collected machine parts which inspired me to design, two-dimensionally and
in traditional painting techniques, impossible machines or mechanical
devices. By and by, the machine(part)s disappeared and were replaced by the
traces, tracks, ruts etc. they have left. I now focus on the changing and
changed landscape, particularly the face of “nature” as altered by human
intervention. I have come to the conclusion that technology (read: western
man) writes or draws into a landscape just like an artist would draw on a
sheet of paper – through and with technology forms are assembled and
manipulated to compose a kind of environment that suits man’s needs. These
landscapes are completely and deliberately artificial, consisting of basic
parts drawn from a pool of man-made elements such as dikes, tunnels,
excavation holes, roads, fences, walls, etc. Many of my paintings’ titles
feature the words "constructed" or "cultivated" to reaffirm this
artificiality. |