THE POSTMODERN NUDE by Corey Postiglione Ever since an anonymous artist sculpted the “Venus of Willendorf“ some twenty thousand years ago, the human form has been an enduring subject for art. The nude as a genre of artistic practice has been represented in a myriad of styles and media down through the ages from the Egyptian’s severe stylizations, to the ancient Greek’s idealized figures, to the naturalism of the Romans. This fascination with the human body continues to be explored even into the 21st century and the epoch commonly referred to as the postmodern. So what is it that constitutes a postmodern representation of the female or male nude, that classical subject that has so endured over time? What establishes this new visual and philosophical view of the nude figure that in some way breaks with the past of this well rehearsed subject, and even goes beyond the recent experimentations of the modern tradition? There are certainly seminal moments in the history of the nude that stand as benchmarks that help to shed light on changing attitudes of figurative representation. It is interesting that a painting of a nude woman should stand as one of the most important works signaling the modern movement. In the Salon of 1865, Manet’s “Olympia,” so shocked the French public with its dramatic pictorial innovations and provocative content, that later critic and historian Clement Greenberg would refer to it (and Manet in general) as the beginning point of modern art. Early in the 20th century, Picasso’s “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon” (1907) broke new ground in both form and content, and singularly initiated the most important movement of that time: Cubism. Picasso’s women, with their radically altered anatomies and the introduction of African masks, swept in a whole new visual language for representing the human form. In the early 1950s, Abstract Expressionist painter Willem de Kooning even surprised Greenberg with his reintroduction of the female figure in his “Woman Series.” In fact, what inspired de Kooning to paint this series of strong and frightening women was his interest in the prehistoric “Venus” figures as he referred to them. Of Course, de Kooning’s women were painted in his signature style of aggressive painterly gesture so that the figures seem to emerge from the brush strokes. So we have witnessed many approaches to the nude as a subject over time with many epochal changes in style and attitude. With the ushering in of what we now term the postmodern we aught not be too surprised that the genre continues to be investigated by a new breed of artists in new ways. What could we rightly call the new features of the postmodern nude? There are several categories I would submit as possible ways of structuring this new sensibility. Firstly, there is the penchant of postmodernism to critique certain modernist tropes. For example, questions surface: how have women been represented in the past, not only in art but in the modern media of film, and television, and mass culture in general—ie., so-called men’s magazines (Playboy, Penthouse), the fashion world, glamour mags, etc. Pop artist Tom Wesselman mined much of this cultural turf in the 1960s with his “Great American Nude” series in which he depicted advertising’s use of the female figure as a sex object to sell products. In fact many historians and critics position the beginning of the postmodern with the advent of Pop art and its relentless forays into mass culture. In the 1980s, artists such as Barbara Kruger and Cindy Sherman created works that explicitly deconstructed the status and representation of women in society. Sherrie Levine, through a series of overtly appropriated works (she copied them) of famous male artists, has challenged the hegemony of the modernist cannon and its exclusive Men’s club. Another tendency of postmodernism is its use of pastiche, that is, its endless borrowing of past styles only to empty them of their original meaning. (Noted cultural historian Fredric Jameson has described pastiche as blank parody.) Eric Fischl has successfully returned to Manet’s quasi realist style to comment on suburban angst and the ennui of sexual practice in the late 20th century. David Salle explores images of misogyny in his overtly graphic paintings of women in compromising positions (often his significant other). What makes the postmodern nude interesting and problematic is its ambiguities: Salle has been charged by some feminist critics as exploiting the female image. Postmodern themes of anachronism and nostalgia inform the strange paintings of Odd Nerdrum with his faux historic and mythic scenes of some past (or future) parallel universe. A host of other painters like Ronald Cohen and Marino Marini have been drawn to ersatz historicism in the style of Italian Mannerists. An even younger generation of figure painters has emerged to further explore the possibilities. John Currin and Lisa Yuskavage have morphed a hybrid style of Pop and Neoclassicism (read Jacques Louis David), romance novel illustration and Rococo (Wateau) to create paintings that are at once lush and erotic, campy and satiric. Cecily Brown has revived de Kooning’s tact with her large abstract expressionistic like canvases that depict, albeit abstractly, writhing orgiastic bodies involved in numerous sexual situations. This exhibit focuses mainly on 2D media, drawing, prints, painting, and photography, for logistical reasons. There are obviously many works in other diverse media, both sculptural and time-based art that reflect recent developments with the nude as subject. Nevertheless, we have brought together what we feel is an exciting collection of works that from one of the aforementioned perspectives exemplifies the current interpretations of this enduring subject. Corey Postiglione is a painter, critic, curator, and teacher living in Chicago. In addition to a Professor of Art History and Critical Theory at Columbia College Chicago. His writing has appeared in numerous publications including Artforum, The New Art Examiner, C-magazine, and Dialogue. |
|
|
Copyright ©2003 Brad Cooper Gallery. All rights reserved.